- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
2 v+ ]/ _" X/ J' V- a4 L/ {% XBoy Induced by Indirect Topical
* b) I4 ?2 P" Y, f9 E" FExposure to Testosterone
* V4 @/ h$ @0 N. p0 h: l" i* u( FSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,27 B. Q% ^4 ]' X6 h8 u, u8 m6 z
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
1 c% ^3 Q5 S( l" L/ h, ~Clinical Pediatrics
; j/ V2 B% H, P# f& G& n5 w0 MVolume 46 Number 6( m; i' f; ~0 D6 o
July 2007 540-543! D, ~6 {3 S7 C9 L3 _3 M8 p
© 2007 Sage Publications; @, r. e1 k7 u3 [& S. y/ ~
10.1177/00099228062966514 q8 j7 P2 O3 L5 y
http://clp.sagepub.com
. Y# I0 T; p9 W. I n% e s; h. Yhosted at) Z! H8 q, d3 s1 y4 S- K$ P
http://online.sagepub.com
" t2 s& a/ V4 J% P/ G2 OPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,. w* f& D0 a' Z2 X% H: |
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
0 z" F* _! o0 |2 iprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
- F1 G# ~9 _ g" R1 ~through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
, [/ \* }) U: S Y! oa higher incidence of organic central nervous system
! [8 [9 n! L# a8 }4 }lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
7 v+ u7 ~2 v/ G; dby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic0 i4 Y, X5 u) Q, K( a
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-0 x v0 ^1 { C. |
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
, x& x. I& d/ j. oreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the1 a* f9 e- a8 {4 z1 c; q( d& P" e" N
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
$ \ Y/ Z; `2 M1 Hment without testicular enlargement, which was due
3 \8 h2 L3 @, U+ T fto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
, Z: y \* [( }% Y6 Y; d! N3 T! T6 gthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-# y5 z4 g( M* H+ Z5 ^/ J
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
4 M0 N5 A: B \8 }- ^child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
) |7 n$ A- E. U' Jtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-2 Z( X' b2 h) M5 j9 T
bly more common than the rare case report in the
8 f! R( t0 B1 G# F$ u" `literature.4
' |/ d0 o; y% i. W7 p- h! bPatient Report
0 L* u9 Q; f# H0 c0 w1 p0 W6 |+ iA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
1 A1 z# i8 G) W0 Y4 Q$ c4 gendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
7 a6 |# t* |+ {$ wof early sexual development. His mother noticed# @- h( \& Y7 @% x: |# q$ d
light colored pubic hair development when he was9 P: z4 X7 u6 u+ `1 H& k5 Q
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
* D Y+ K: Y4 @8 _South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
1 j4 M0 v6 w; H7 b. i- n0 l/ RAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,4 D$ h2 V& [7 j# c4 R
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of( c7 z- g7 K# F1 ?( f: V# X2 w
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
* }" f' S+ L2 b, W2 Be-mail: [email protected]., W+ T+ G* g7 ~* l2 p
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
% m/ b+ ~1 @% D) Mdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
; i' |) Y: L" s* ?/ @ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
1 c0 s. Y# Q) i/ y/ @1 a1 a4 cwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with a- b1 Z8 Q. v) z" G
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
3 l& c+ j; \ }20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
6 v' h# S5 C) }: vof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
. E! {; \$ |7 I4 Hsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,; e: d7 p, U+ H' V
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development B' r# y' L" H. ~* `) H/ {
was age appropriate.7 p# z* z! q' j; g
The family history was remarkable for the father,
: i, l( V- c8 \/ U/ R0 K, Rwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
' X9 E: J- ~- T V% s' {% rwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s" x% H: O) G E0 o- Q- c" j3 W
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
_: g. x2 `: P+ I$ K1 ^early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
' i# u3 W" v& U6 F, D' v4 [The father denied taking any other medication. The+ O) _. l) t1 A! R$ _4 j4 u5 B
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
% K7 p. p5 {+ V! l5 jwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
) o& ?7 j) @$ }7 R3 G+ w5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
# i; w$ ^/ |$ U/ ]: ecocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
; m5 P6 V% T: h" Q6 {tives. There were no siblings.! M7 _$ x9 x D7 D3 q
Physical Examination
% T! B4 L1 \9 K& x8 ^' aThe physical examination revealed a very active,+ `, H- `# U: u# N& W
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented+ m8 {" b- k+ w+ z+ v
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
* F7 W: ?4 s/ A4 h' _3 l90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
3 j8 q; m% X$ N(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
4 u) t9 {5 E- h$ _2 uvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of$ m, ^7 d# ^8 D$ |1 R( W% \+ q
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
% B+ k+ U a+ |The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
" x7 l/ f. e+ n& m0 c; |3 Oenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
% L' F- N* x% h$ q& |' N8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well8 L" n0 H3 p, ^0 ?, _3 K
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around1 y4 L7 H" k6 k) i' u' u
5408 D* a5 K, N! \) c! Y
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from* ~: p. c2 T' {% `* U; M7 d& {
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The7 w1 q, c/ l& x. P1 ~
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.4 \1 s9 v6 ]& o# v* V4 y4 Y
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat2 B4 z% G7 |) x/ T9 Q9 X8 f8 X
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no7 D a$ [' h4 w* I! {9 C# v9 X& W
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.: W8 |1 s& V; k6 }! T& M
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
9 f8 a% U/ h2 X+ Ybilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion5 k+ j/ L6 P2 u' S. P; R) E
of papilledema.
) a7 d3 u [* \* c+ vLaboratory Evaluation# v. r! n" f5 W& g. L+ T4 C
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by# o9 D( \# c6 s
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
6 Z+ ~7 S) ?; o% k. {- y3 Klogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
2 j; F: f2 U& l/ [( Z9 I3 ~6 }/ F6 a! \karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
; C1 ~& o" [; o: Q% @showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
0 V! K3 }8 f. A# }: A% vlating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
, g& M6 s8 O% ~' Q( l- C* VThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood$ z `) v6 D k
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
& J$ T, [4 F; `4 ~$ x8 c: R, iwithin normal range for his age. The concentration# G. b, {. F) D4 ]3 p
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL; W. V R) }- ~1 p: E7 N
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
( ]: U0 t4 `/ U; Q5 t1 xng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
4 C/ h. ?+ T3 F8 R1 L; @$ e0 W7 zterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
8 u9 L4 o- v/ o$ t7 {5 p' b4 `0 zdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
! ]) }% Z% L9 l49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
, s3 T% a- k0 p$ `, Uwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-6 E7 ~! a* J: p8 T
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
! A5 f. s: J: d" ]/ ltestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
. \5 I& J: c7 o2 nand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than; c8 j/ x8 e( C; y0 X0 S
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular# n% b9 A$ S4 e+ y3 Q
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
- H6 E' v. d. L8 ]% }4 Bconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL9 I" |0 j" {7 U
(prepubertal).
% Y: b* a# }* |0 X! SThe parents were notified about the laboratory
% c0 f3 O5 ~% m- vresults and were informed that all of the tests were4 _3 T/ u+ o E! V. t
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
+ T; ~, }' N# f1 jfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to4 }2 v1 @7 m \: A, A' e
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-6 l' K6 `1 I- O I3 A
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
7 e j. h8 H$ c' R( w' o6 F/ SPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
- z* ]. v1 v4 I) N5 Pchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
! i$ |3 t" T4 G' s" n- k) K' R5 a2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained: _5 c4 N, g/ g0 o; ^6 [- Q3 g
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
+ k1 J/ z0 ?0 r+ }0 N8 _: spletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at9 p! G! z- N r9 x' `% b& f0 ^
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
& k- y2 V% I5 B9 d( r7 C8 }; vmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.% z6 _5 ^+ p D- L$ {8 M
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-, Y) ?1 }$ n u& m' C3 |
ing frequent erections.
1 H0 M0 @% ^1 B2 Z8 i$ qBoth parents were again questioned about use of
( R0 h; l- W; Y, j* K, f5 N& Yany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
- _( y" X5 F4 O) ?8 pthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
9 q1 K6 p$ a' @; yTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5415 i3 u4 T# g* y/ u9 D
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
3 r* \- e, D! N j& ling over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for; n: N7 K' Q, v
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
, {! y' ]6 h+ D) Z2 `# Uto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
6 B, ^6 ~7 H, ` M( [. Yscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
: q# L5 O9 w: M" G( ~6 n) u% J2 }& jsecondary to depression.
% Y1 b) s& r8 W! W% x- cThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
" D4 V2 L+ A: r8 v% g3 t! m4 B) hThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his& o* T. ?9 `0 X9 |
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
% g' Z# ~+ |( n7 j: {& d0 lnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
- r7 T3 D+ V" _$ `2 kThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
" w+ Q6 x7 |' @# M1 cwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
$ ]1 ?4 V6 M0 E7 C. _was high, he then read the product information8 C5 w# R" K( d$ R
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
7 ~2 L/ T3 z" C; \son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they2 e: H: Z) W' j! ?8 b0 R; d% J
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the1 j# o7 O J! X* a( p8 C
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
+ K. M6 z) ^5 N; R& Dbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone$ X. `$ _3 Y4 t) f' `9 K: M& N* T
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
& X `& L0 k% K, }laboratory to obtain the test.
& a# d) m: y' Y4 SDiscussion' [% [. z) i2 ^! Q
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
7 ^4 e0 S( ?6 Q7 n1 k t. fsexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
! I- G& J$ |. v3 l/ \1 d8 T- ePrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
1 v; C' M8 S& r8 o' \it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
+ }) M1 b; D( d! \; t$ k' v x2 w+ }thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
' }9 O/ I* X. X3 ?+ H. J9 umon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
! K4 D. R/ h" |0 N+ F$ F9 amay have a central nervous system lesion that is
1 T( U5 ?1 W2 I( x4 Oresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
. F# R( j" u Y) X: {8 v1 Lamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-, Q2 P" c n" a5 ?. `7 S
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in1 u' ^, b( ]- ^2 Z. O; Z8 J
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
) Z$ l/ `5 D) w: H; s4 p, V! n3 \ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-% L; A3 E. {$ H- a* K5 w
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by3 r7 ~8 k& c& l
gonadotropins.1,3
( S) \2 o$ [7 c# [7 U W3 AGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
$ l/ D8 o8 y0 K: A* X& A5 T. Lcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
p. k+ y, m8 S2 r3 \androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or9 j( s/ |+ k2 j! y$ q8 J& Z
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-/ N( J$ ?; ?5 \' |# P% A
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing6 B2 p. P+ ?' @) A3 a, O G
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
# ]! M" {; l1 Wadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious7 y/ g# d4 J; R" R
puberty in boys.3,4
2 ]( O2 y/ `) T. e4 A) k. E3 n; nThe most common form of congenital adrenal5 ]- e* S# g2 f( N
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.5 h9 x& l) o2 U/ I" f( Y+ t$ t
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in1 i$ g+ t+ x& z! w
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,' g& F6 Z: g, W
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
1 u& x8 G+ P1 Y" Y i4 j0 z& u. \; ?: g+ jexcess.1,3
* ~3 s( q @; M% S" Q5 cat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from' A( Y. X* |, K- q6 P
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007# ~3 a. ^" |+ ^/ O$ s& S; S& ~6 D& A
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
) x- C( @* x$ u5 N( X6 \+ G1 V$ xindependent precocious puberty, which is also known8 D) Y1 @# z) S* A/ k/ S
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a* H" s5 N: W$ [' |
very young age. The physical findings in these boys% C2 ^% ] r, E" S0 A& \
with this disorder are full pubertal development,+ T1 w, `, B+ {% p( l% `
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys f; \/ w8 I+ i( Y# e9 r
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder* N2 L+ r }& R# n8 d
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show) Q: S9 C! m! F" k3 [
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-4 v. U) M( B6 G/ D6 X1 C6 d
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
; v6 g0 t ?) Z3 s- G& Gautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
U3 J7 y7 _( |males; therefore, other male members of the family
; |- I- t5 B* @/ G. N( M1 c8 `: s2 _may have similar precocious puberty.3
/ Z. p% _' O0 N7 F% TIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
# z% O: [ Z2 b% O% bsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
7 ?/ x$ u% ], E. {* _cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis& v& Q/ F4 ^8 s
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
9 v7 I$ X' v. \/ Rstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally, p% h3 G+ T: O* j( k
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the2 q. Y8 w! t& y. r3 z% q f
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-; {& \9 }+ s, s7 R2 M0 k
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our- u' \; C% |/ U7 a5 p+ U
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,# p) z9 S6 F4 z- A
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase6 i8 m1 `) t2 B; w8 `8 c& G: |
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-. w' @% I* H( M0 n' ? d
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.* l9 A Y9 ^) x% f) P
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
5 y$ g# A8 P% ]2 {7 ?3 ^: msuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
, L4 N8 o" d/ h9 xthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
( J9 e0 |% {0 Z6 O& }/ Gpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and% s# S% ?6 R. S
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
: `$ W9 R& s, H3 q* p V% _8 Xterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was0 a3 q: C, Z' a4 u5 z! D
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
+ b: z0 K8 @: a9 w3 ?, l# X; XDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
0 V" r# o+ s" S* @1 S% ^1 u* C+ ccream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
) T5 h' {4 g7 r' S3 Tunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
1 K6 N4 {8 ]3 aSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the, A. h: z: }$ X# _, j C; e0 B
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
$ x" N8 @7 m( X9 M4 W8 t. Weven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male$ y6 ]$ _. S h# ?; ^1 c5 j) k
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
& v" G1 ]( W; ?tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
/ T! c# P! R$ h/ ~% e1 y4 HOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,! V; ^* P, k m' B8 H
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that% O# s7 c2 ]: V. n2 ?% v& F0 j
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos- q F6 Y) a( E# K" G% n6 {9 J
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more; t3 A- w; P" q& D6 r% J
active in young children exposed to testosterone# w. T( u' f" m/ R$ E+ H- o
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-: r# y% c; z, [0 u+ z
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to$ [ W7 C3 g y* p) A
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
4 s. w$ g9 H" _3 |# s9 _8 kchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
- j! V; h/ Z' hadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
2 [- v7 h* z* L5 B4 `- mThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
4 A+ J$ ?) } F0 {4 mearly childhood on pubertal development and final8 S9 q. f" t8 K$ H
adult height are not fully known and always remain& C5 r7 v0 B& ^3 z, x" r, u3 S
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
: e4 \/ ~9 X* N7 G6 d* Uterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
* q6 m* h( l9 t! F" }; k8 B. ?acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
! D$ Y' V: \ M. |( a2 d+ bcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
7 k! M7 K9 [# a$ N( u2 q# S$ mdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9" n% L6 v5 ^. T. r6 g% a0 T2 M
There are conflicting reports and controversy8 s" l) v% Y: o& Z& w( L8 b
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
s i. e; G* bpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
; Y; L& ^( J0 `& K. O- padult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
* T+ J; C1 V8 H Vulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,/ q, @, e3 P$ B: v
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between2 e- h2 ^. `8 L
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
2 C1 k; h7 f6 X2 lpenile length in clinical studies.
# I, G& q. q, |# _1 i' T2 hNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is0 P9 D3 p% d7 j9 G/ o$ s3 o4 d
going to experience any of the untoward effects from, f$ }( M6 s, P0 u9 @& \. b
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
7 L* u$ `! m& Z. s% C( S; C- Hthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.! `4 A# x, i5 f6 o
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of; z( @# c$ q) w* x X' N
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at& c5 I$ I* Q- Q+ I/ _* y2 k7 u+ s3 i
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
: ~9 H( W7 h" Cheight will not be affected.
4 w. y9 B, Q! h; }( P RAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
# R; J) @& l+ q c [- |" Sability of androgen products in our society may8 [, L, O0 C v
indeed cause more virilization in male or female1 A" K% f* i" ?+ U B. ]. M
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
) {. h) X( J: O6 jgen products must be considered and specific ques-+ ~- u5 F9 S% V8 X( L
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or7 }1 J1 K9 M7 r5 T/ Y$ q
gel should be asked of the family members during
& v ~- L. v8 w2 w7 {: D2 l1 Q% Sthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
) i) d& Z Q1 V0 s; {+ Bilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-6 b; |& m [* {: P3 h; C; z5 q
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by7 F$ r; t. h, U7 H( U( J
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a% }# S; v( `5 \7 N4 D
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may+ L$ I% X% I8 U; ]+ U% j2 `) S
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
) \1 N& U4 \3 p* iinvestigation. The primary care physician should be' W+ _7 N1 e4 I! e( K; X9 D5 d7 I
aware of this fact, because most of these children
: E$ m. A9 J+ v4 w5 k* M% Nmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
. l- L/ ~7 I3 E) y4 o. e, g; aDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
6 N( _2 L0 {( N# wwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or
1 Y& q' G- y r5 x' ffemale child who might come in contact with some-8 J# h- k" e( p
one using any of these products.
* P: `& q2 u/ @% S1 W/ ]8 VReferences
, ^$ `, P: q* g1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation( n* y. p) m9 Y* B
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric- \% @7 G# `) O7 Y
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
$ R) t1 ?3 ~+ j) B0 n/ I7 P+ ]* H/ L2 r2002: 565-628.
+ Y1 L4 |* b; q: i% C5 a2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
; ^* c+ [+ @6 }% P1 K% q6 wpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|