- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
% ]7 t1 w p5 p1 P* NBoy Induced by Indirect Topical: \4 a: i Q- g" l8 J
Exposure to Testosterone0 e- e W0 B+ a
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
; I5 J( n' z! ^8 M" Oand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1! |; d8 G9 a' N$ Q
Clinical Pediatrics
/ X. ^# B/ _5 d' p3 i2 {2 Z2 ]% AVolume 46 Number 6
S! J+ o' a* Z/ E1 TJuly 2007 540-5439 f( O- z1 s4 D- M# r+ T
© 2007 Sage Publications* V* G' e/ O: D1 R6 Y* _9 m9 M
10.1177/0009922806296651
! L: P) y7 D7 ehttp://clp.sagepub.com- W9 s7 G, O# \) L$ H
hosted at
. J* c$ C0 {: S( s; j9 K7 ^http://online.sagepub.com
5 s$ U T' @' [# [Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,; I! g& K: M4 M0 ^) O
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
! D( g8 x p6 Vprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
2 V! p) U1 ^* R, I `6 [0 Kthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has. H1 ^( ^; D z# D+ I; L
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
, G6 o) x- s5 Jlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
" L5 i( g& u/ M$ Nby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
9 m* J! [) R1 x3 e3 O6 w: A5 Ahair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
" h* m. V% B# u1 A# u' Xcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We2 p4 p0 l2 m ]
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
% w4 G" B. I8 H3 g; Nenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
5 u; @# Z- ?5 G! t& pment without testicular enlargement, which was due
- ]- F7 G7 \ F9 }- J3 b/ O1 \to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by$ n5 V, Y, [6 n" P$ J
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
& A9 R/ h; }( r" i- amation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
[: r0 K; q2 Zchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of! D7 ~: o B( j+ P$ z8 Q( U
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
4 ~, j( c2 R; Z/ Dbly more common than the rare case report in the
, u4 U$ {. T# l3 D: u9 b {; {& s, Fliterature.4
/ y/ A$ ?6 V, KPatient Report
9 ~9 w0 O; `- C9 V% z2 rA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
7 M$ o, C+ b1 ~& Z" k: lendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern# d0 R4 @* @" {
of early sexual development. His mother noticed( H' O" c0 `1 q; P
light colored pubic hair development when he was* W. h- h( o7 B3 z/ Q( a' r$ e) z
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
9 X# E) H. x" ZSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.2 s5 O) d- ^- K
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,( V7 Y0 j2 h3 o4 s" O# f
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of2 H5 f5 A$ y4 k4 H
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;( Z# W, o: I- ] y
e-mail: [email protected].
, X9 n: { ^- R# \6 ~; D7 Z7 H3 Uabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
+ t; K" n6 w% ddarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
0 B6 V- f* X) n0 L$ ^3 U, L- ament of his penis and frequent erections. The child
r' O! R0 `+ m$ M zwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with0 I* R) Q0 {9 U8 t* Z$ ~) D; ?
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
( K+ P0 O9 u5 P8 S/ f# H20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year' Y1 r; F5 o8 L8 x0 }$ r# M
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with& j" g3 B0 ?, _' w0 r
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
# s& [5 ?# i& S6 k9 land his psychosocial and psychomotor development
$ r' ]% V% G$ O) Kwas age appropriate.
& d6 q# k1 w8 ]* G0 }8 y- jThe family history was remarkable for the father,
, F6 u' ~) i" v" [2 _0 C; ?8 i6 Bwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
" c6 f6 S' u( P" \" a3 Fwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
- `, w1 l5 _4 ^. Hheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
5 A6 r% F9 U" Zearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14." o( M: q3 ~$ _/ B; ?8 P
The father denied taking any other medication. The& M M8 [( h3 `9 b6 G. r
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
* \; B! C$ P, i9 u# r6 S n% {/ U( Kwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet% _: y* y2 @3 p7 D6 H. x
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
# Z; C( J) r* s2 G# Bcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
: x$ {& t& S( F; N. g0 j/ wtives. There were no siblings.
: h. T& n. w. I! |9 hPhysical Examination" a, G; P& V7 c6 Q! F
The physical examination revealed a very active,) k! `$ ?: d7 y6 n" b3 {' {: o
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented& ?, q0 ^2 p/ V9 D; C: n x
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
3 z: r u+ Z) I, J8 G/ ~90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
4 @0 m. E6 P& L. g# n: X(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth( n9 c+ B9 c1 Y" D$ J
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
4 ]; i7 I* Q' Q9 }the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.. S! X E& T) n" T
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
v2 W- E+ ~/ Xenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
4 c2 u; j5 J& E2 q8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well% Q1 s( m. @3 O$ [) k9 s
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around4 S$ ^1 B6 V* u' ]6 y7 P
5408 j V( j5 m: ~4 n8 M, ~' l; I
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
1 \! E0 N7 o4 h# k( z8 |the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The% F0 M+ g, \- J! P5 C0 I
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.% r% H! a! L9 l
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
" Y# w1 y: r1 p1 C, Zoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
, B- @% R- t5 W6 U. J: _2 t+ gabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.& [: X2 Z E! L
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
$ N% H" ~, H0 _$ k" b" Nbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
, x Y3 s1 }6 E3 \: y* W& `of papilledema., F" B& D3 o0 z
Laboratory Evaluation& C- D" A9 d- M9 o% M9 l
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
! b: @1 L% \& o9 Q4 s& husing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-. {. @' B( W3 w0 c% j
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal, z! R. |: i( H; a' @, O8 n4 R ~
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
1 G& q9 N3 H$ ~2 a4 lshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-9 t _& ^' e( P4 V5 o
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
$ d6 c1 N0 `# Z" IThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
5 w& M! M+ O8 ?urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
X7 [7 @3 y1 w- X; ]# Mwithin normal range for his age. The concentration
' q2 Z" y4 [9 Yof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL% j) n7 ]1 i1 U
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
, M; u5 z/ j, ang/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
" O M6 L E; a. _& vterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
/ e- K6 m( a4 g- P0 H; o7 Z' mdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
# v0 d) B+ x, P- ?: W0 }49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
S9 o4 P7 ^! g2 J0 s V9 Cwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-! {2 e% s2 ]& ?" {4 f- S9 B
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total1 r/ o5 i% Z1 w5 Y" A( A3 J
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
. D# A6 K& v2 T# b4 D- ]+ Xand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
& a# E, \6 q0 {8 A5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
\6 e% h. C |( pstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone1 @1 x" a- @) n9 ] O5 t. @
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL7 w- M/ q: d% z; g; `
(prepubertal). B& B0 ^1 [6 q+ [
The parents were notified about the laboratory
7 S2 e& c$ k- b' |results and were informed that all of the tests were) V+ N& N) i; h$ r: F8 O6 L4 D! w
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
/ g$ [3 T7 P' k6 Bfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to0 r" @, C+ V4 d9 ]- H
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
" [* l) a9 i2 C+ y7 Wever, the family did not return for 4 months.2 ]3 [. P: H# N- r! L6 W( N/ X
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
2 _% l/ v$ L2 o2 j: F7 `5 Schild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained" g: h5 X6 U6 D* e" B! w9 r
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained9 B$ c1 l$ R! n& V3 a$ h. r" P
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-5 T( W" U% @2 S2 {
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at! [+ H. ~, p, r. L5 h; [7 ?
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2. ^; ]( e9 W/ J2 R
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
9 @5 r8 o# z; J/ J/ }/ r' N6 s/ mThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
! o+ D( ^( C" U/ m, `ing frequent erections.8 R' k6 ]1 P! X& R6 @
Both parents were again questioned about use of
5 z& g2 R9 [6 uany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
) @8 W, h1 `: {the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
$ u( F7 p7 V6 G9 B1 @3 `3 [; b; xTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541" P9 g1 P# n5 ?$ Z E$ T
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
/ ^% [- e7 v0 _% q+ _$ R: Eing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
: q7 |$ q% K }* T" a* y% ja year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed( P1 C7 x( @3 `" r% q$ X" D$ x
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
9 w& W8 N K. H b x% hscribed by his family physician for decreased libido+ `6 A: {. }+ t* z0 V' v/ l5 E
secondary to depression.
2 d* c/ f. ?% iThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
9 g# z/ P! Y z& Y6 gThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his! \4 ?8 i2 h" h, n/ Q$ B
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
) K. k4 }4 \4 l) G$ G0 u& n/ `' gnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.# X4 O# r: b! h2 k+ P
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
; o6 F3 B; N6 X1 c7 Kwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
9 s8 z" a! f" v9 R; A ywas high, he then read the product information6 T# Y; c1 n8 h' q* T, d& h
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
) q; @+ ]: O& F/ j Uson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
' a* S" Q7 @2 Gdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
! a1 ` E$ a# D, p( } U6 t: s8 Hfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had, v Y; O* p+ W J! a7 b
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone: j/ \ S- v' S( P- M% Y. @# T0 N
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the+ }8 K2 k/ e$ p, U7 a g
laboratory to obtain the test.
8 x& g& K( `- C/ q- }5 jDiscussion
* y/ ^. d/ ?, `9 a% _) ~* jPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary! K2 R) F1 J2 a2 Q; L6 O
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
0 ?; |; w0 N* q7 P$ GPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when/ M. T+ ?5 q2 s7 O: e; I
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
% A1 X6 o+ d1 \thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-2 ~* a1 q2 p% `/ r" S5 w% z
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
& U2 z& k5 B# t) Cmay have a central nervous system lesion that is- d! U1 q; K* M& E' {. P7 z& l5 N
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-. O; J/ b' C! d1 b
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
* A6 Y9 ^7 ?) g& x$ @4 [% dsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
7 {9 s) J. m) ]8 ?: { Yboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
7 q2 r# |9 `3 Gization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
* _' v1 A9 i/ r7 N3 [rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by. w; i7 O G9 H: @% P \3 g( Z+ C5 B
gonadotropins.1,3
9 q" q) n+ k$ |( b4 K2 I5 }Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-4 X2 K+ u, \! A# l# r4 @9 M
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate; d, J! ]- `% R+ B
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or4 O$ j5 U" S! I- h+ u7 x! G, f( u
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-9 J* O2 f+ y; ^+ h# Z7 p
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing( R, k8 r( F9 V6 a8 Z8 n. Y6 u6 B
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive9 ] Z' v+ Z4 H1 ^1 s. @
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
1 g9 I! ?4 ?* |9 z g/ ipuberty in boys.3,4
: b) \0 ?0 x9 e `5 h! d5 fThe most common form of congenital adrenal
[% Y) A) m7 ]) x# Vhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
3 q8 M' S. t0 h% DThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
& u) Q$ }9 p( @excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,3 p7 B, N7 X z5 k6 Q( Z
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
# k5 c) H3 ?5 ?excess.1,3
. I. O! U# e; w' @/ X8 Mat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from, f0 i# ?3 p: H3 Z, N9 J
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
, k; \6 B, a! f) l$ `A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
$ s8 `, G$ [8 u0 ~9 S' A6 S8 Xindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
6 v9 T9 q! o- `/ `7 las testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a1 ?0 L; Z7 [1 z {' ]9 I* S
very young age. The physical findings in these boys1 e0 ?+ {2 t1 q( g/ n
with this disorder are full pubertal development,+ r' A7 M6 l7 g9 t6 b+ [
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys2 ^7 }. }9 t" g% G& c' r
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder, f3 V8 M K( k, o1 d g' L/ u8 n
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
. _% [' m( _0 I, v8 `pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
$ O/ E, e3 M$ @6 V% g/ dreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked+ m4 ]" R' O9 _9 M/ i
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only% c2 d1 K+ p. Y) F9 ?+ l+ M& e+ X
males; therefore, other male members of the family
0 T# c! B1 J7 r' bmay have similar precocious puberty.35 D1 R3 t6 l$ b
In our patient, physical examination was incon-9 g D, F! L6 g4 O( a8 E
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-3 e8 W; E- b3 S# s3 D/ \
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis' a7 X" F; J% }, m4 Q4 w! k" V) A
was in the differential diagnosis because his father. i( R# n' \$ `8 G
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,/ ?7 i2 w+ B" V V$ ?9 y: y
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the4 _/ M- I) z! {6 p* {. S
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
! ?! p& w( T' \ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
0 g4 P' `; ?: N/ v: rbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,; o/ Q( E( F! F* Q# P) H
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase2 v0 t- E$ L+ s" Y: ^9 O
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-# C! ]5 c6 x% s* Z+ ?$ Q# Y
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
- c( F( G* g' |The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly, t3 n/ v: Z, K; |$ Y
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because* @- I" V# r' l
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
R4 e w Y/ g% apearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and9 L7 { s2 E3 Y% ] |' S$ N
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
) ^" M! t9 K$ i/ G+ y% X0 y# g& ]terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
0 X D9 l9 q! V+ ]using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
/ u3 i/ C/ q9 A" u( ~3 j& GDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
- ]& {2 a9 ^. P3 J: C) Ncream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to1 d; ]+ q5 |: K8 b: F: b
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
. _& ]. g8 b* o0 x2 Q7 KSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the5 e( W5 O5 t# ]9 c5 I
baseline value in those females who were exposed to$ k5 ~# v1 Y% \. Z6 A$ T U
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
( Q# _1 ?' _) L Dpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-* p* j/ a! S3 q6 _+ B3 T, j
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.) C% h, b0 ~2 T8 G- |, e8 R
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
, G1 Q& {' q0 m% Hwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that! n/ c, S' l$ Y) f" {
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-1 F$ o% E- Q/ |3 ?' G4 W
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
* w% u6 _" l7 P' g5 U5 j# Cactive in young children exposed to testosterone. y7 @5 K) \) E3 K Z4 c
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-8 K( T# |" P; B6 ]( T
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to$ ~! I' _0 x* f/ T* X# G
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
) f1 f9 `. C" `& A, i9 p! l& ~, Bchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and, o* E+ G$ z7 S/ ^6 R& @
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
L1 q8 k; x, B A' C6 S$ RThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
5 s; F5 Q" @9 `: j% Xearly childhood on pubertal development and final
, h9 i6 z- e' o* l- I% Padult height are not fully known and always remain1 E6 y. q3 {3 f3 L- L* `
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-; U/ R5 @# g; y
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some1 ?& H! Y6 {! v# f- ], F4 i
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after4 G* O1 i& Z6 Q7 c& I( L
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation5 i& a8 o* Z% c9 z* B$ v. g# F
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
0 U3 P3 r* {$ C# B4 _" F- GThere are conflicting reports and controversy
; T4 \# r7 j6 O8 l) ?over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
9 D( Y' }# Z7 h& R$ vpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal! n: e; {' S9 c& ^
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
7 \6 ]* d1 h! @, U, s1 G+ [ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
( H: D( k G+ k5 l* ?Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
7 Z3 N* ]/ V8 echildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult" a" L- h: t4 O; n
penile length in clinical studies.
* V# k$ Z+ O! ^! @( Z8 gNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is. q8 H) C) r* f, d
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
& J; f6 H. d, `testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
5 J T. [$ A! v. p" ]the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.% V* a5 e! W- p' I O
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
+ R" Z2 }+ _* f5 n7 m+ adiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at3 I+ z7 i+ O) ]. o! \! }
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
( M- m) g& o3 W) ]3 kheight will not be affected.0 g; h& x6 L9 I6 T3 O$ C0 a6 J
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
9 u% Z9 y4 t: Uability of androgen products in our society may# e. U/ v6 n: [/ p, g+ k
indeed cause more virilization in male or female: N* n. m. H& M7 E. o# X
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
: u% N+ P0 A1 B, egen products must be considered and specific ques-
. F6 j: x5 ^! \1 o5 F* d; Q. g1 Xtioning about the use of a testosterone product or- A9 {9 f2 z2 H
gel should be asked of the family members during
/ j3 ]/ ~, ~; c) {0 i; \the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
6 f0 n, F5 r$ g6 h; W) k' j* lilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-/ Y# m l4 O5 M
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by) A3 H5 e& g* a: z3 |
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a9 m1 V$ ]* ~0 m/ v
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may# T% X8 i! P; A7 K" L
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
; k) `+ `+ T& z+ `! A; zinvestigation. The primary care physician should be
; ?+ e1 E2 P7 i3 Faware of this fact, because most of these children. d! \' I6 m$ |9 l9 W% ?) b
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’- H% v7 Y! @0 U% X1 U6 U) P
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a5 j6 R+ _8 A% U* H2 H# p
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
# Q( w9 k) _2 J8 cfemale child who might come in contact with some-, \ h9 W4 S4 |' {! Y C+ a$ G
one using any of these products.* H, \. [3 y' y1 H3 [) X# k3 J4 s' ?
References2 V6 b/ g+ c' m% p9 g/ j
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
% l' o: u+ u+ L; [1 |3 Z" j7 }and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric/ p0 D- k: R* b0 A X1 E2 v7 S+ E
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
* h7 N* ], w+ S" U2002: 565-628.$ l- s1 Q3 }3 h0 @* w0 W+ l
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
+ S! |& B6 y. r) o; Npuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|